Paper Round
July 14, 2010

Tiger's divorce

Posted on 14/07/2010

Tiger Woods' 11th-hour decision to ditch his faithful putter hit the headlines yesterday, and Neil Squires in The Daily Express believes his caddie Steve Williams could be next.

Tiger Woods' caddie ­Steve Williams may have clouded his own future with unprecedented criticism of his employer but definitive confirmation of another ­divorce finally came through from the embattled world No 1 yesterday.

Separations are always painful and yesterday, when Woods delivered the news that it was all over at St Andrews, there was a sadness in his eyes.

Before the recent painful episodes, they had been through many good times. It had seemed like a marriage made in heaven, one that would last forever.

But the truth is that if one party cannot behave, a pair cannot have a future together and so, yesterday, the relationship ended. Woods and his putter of 11 years are no longer an item.

The faithful Scotty Cameron, which has brought Woods 13 of his 14 Majors, is being replaced by a heavier Nike weapon at The Open tomorrow. Another crutch in Woods’ world, one that lasted longer than his collapsed marriage, has gone.

It is hard to overemphasise the importance of this development. In the wizarding world, it would be akin to Harry Potter changing his wand.

But the putting malaise which reached a new low for Woods last month at the AT&T National, where he missed 15 putts inside 10 feet, persuaded him that action needed to be taken. The sluggish pace of the Old Course’s vast greens has confirmed it.

Meanwhile, Lance Armstrong's dreams of an eighth Tour de France victory may be over, but he may be winning the locals' hearts, writes William Fotheringham in The Guardian

Falling off at the foot of the Col de La Ramaz on Sunday cannot have been pleasant for Lance Armstrong. Hitting the deck at that speed never is. And the crash effectively ended Armstrong's chances of winning the Tour de France for an eighth time, or of managing one last visit to the podium. But every cloud has a silver lining. That crash and the 50 torrid kilometres that followed it could mark a turning point in Armstrong's relationship with the French cycling public.

When Armstrong announced his comeback in 2008, he had unfinished business. His return to cycling was not merely about publicising his cancer work; he didn't need to pin a number on his back to do that.

There was a sense across cycling that he wanted to ensure that when he retired a second time, he would leave people with sentiments that were rather different: "how our sport misses him" rather than "what a relief he's gone".

"Return of cycling's greatest comeback man" has not gone to script.

Last year Armstrong earned few friends as the saga with Alberto Contador unfolded amid a welter of catty Twitter messages. This year Floyd Landis's email barrage and the ensuing federal inquiry have thickened the plot again. But bizarrely, if Armstrong plays his cards right in the next few days, he could leave the sport as he would wish to.

The Texan has crashed more times this year than in all his seven victorious Tours put together. He has lost oodles of time (a technical term). When he climbs, his legs now rotate at the speed of a windmill rather than an electric whisk. Let's not say it too loud but he looks old. On Tuesday's second Alpine stage he was well back from the leaders. He looks human, vulnerable. And that's the point. Human is what the French public has always liked.

For over 40 years, the French have had a tendency to prefer unlucky cyclists with a human side to efficient winners who sweep all before them. That dates back to the days of Raymond Poulidor, still the most popular figure on the Tour de France, still the most sought-after autograph in the morning at the village départ.

Poulidor, famously, never wore the yellow jersey but in the race for the hearts of the public he outstripped the more clinical Jacques Anquetil, who won the Tour five times. Anquetil was reduced to stunts such as taking on the motorpaced Bordeaux-Paris marathon a few hours after finishing the Dauphiné Libéré stage race in order to win hearts and minds, but was never loved in the way that "Poupou" still is.

It was the same with Eddy Merckx, the same with Miguel Indurain and it has been the same with Lance Armstrong since his first Tour win in 1999. There have been doubts about the Texan's alleged use of banned drugs – always hotly denied by him and never proven – leading to shouts of "dopé" from the roadside but the claims against him were not at the root of the French public's lack of love for Lance.

Nor was it due to the way he bullied Filippo Simeoni out of a possible stage win in 2004. It wasn't even the fact that he jokingly called the French football team "assholes" in 2006 (after recent events that might even strike a chord with the homme dans la rue). By then the damage had been done and it boiled down to one thing: the Texan was simply too successful, too dominant.

Apart from the 2003 Tour, where he struggled due to the heat and a crash, all his victories were surgical strikes rather than guerrilla warfare. It was powerfully, efficiently, meticulously done but once admiration for his return from life-threatening cancer had faded into the background, it all lacked romance. And romance in cycling means one thing: having a horrible time on the bike but smiling as it happens.

So here is what Armstrong has to do in the next few days. Work selflessly for Levi Leipheimer. Ferry a few bottles up and down the bunch for the television cameras. Attempt the odd coup de panache worthy of an ageing champion. Smile for the photographers, if possible dandling his son on his knee, or if no child of his own is available, someone else's. Bring out the broken French he produced in 2004. If he sees a dog or a black cat running across the road, aim for it. Lance Armstrong the new Raymond Poulidor? You read it here first.

© ESPN EMEA Ltd